Rant on IBS ED2008

So the winner of the first debate has been announced. And I spot another anomaly in this competition.
The reply speech is being done pro-con when it shouldda been con-pro. This system is unforgiving to the con. And don’t get me started with the prelim round motions. I got hold of the list from one of the participant, and let me tell you this, most of the motions is part truism part biassed. Here’s an example:”sektor jasa keuangan memberikan kontribusi terbesar dalam pendapatan Nasional Indonesia”.

Oh I could go on and on. Should stop here for now.